APPENDIX
3
Short
Equality Impact and Outcome Assessment (EIA) Template -
2019
EIAs make services better for
everyone and support value for money by getting services right
first time.
EIAs enable us to
consider all the information about a service, policy or strategy
from an equalities perspective and then action plan to get the best
outcomes for staff and service-users[1].They
analyse how all our work as a council might impact differently on
different groups[2].
They help us make good decisions and evidence how we have reached
these decisions[3].
See end notes for full guidance. Either hover
the mouse over the end note link (eg: ID No.6) or use the hyperlinks
(‘Ctrl’ key and left click).
For further support or
advice please contact:
- BHCC:
Communities, Equality and Third Sector Team on ext 2301
-
CCG: Engagement and Equalities team (Jane Lodge/Meg
Lewis)
1.
Equality Impact and Outcomes Assessment (EIA)
Template
First, consider whether you need to
complete an EIA, or if there is another way to evidence assessment
of impacts, or that an EIA is not needed[4].
Title of EIA[5]
|
Attendance Policy and Procedure
|
ID No.[6]
|
|
Team/Department[7]
|
HR&OD
|
Focus of EIA[8]
|
The introduction of a new Attendance Policy
and Procedure to replace the existing Attendance Management
Procedure within the council. This new policy and procedure
addresses issues that were raised by the Well-being Group (with
union, management and HR representation) back in 2016 and one of
the recommendations of this group was a review of the current
procedure. Over the past 12 months the council has been consulting
with the trade unions over the new policy and procedure and this
has also been shared with the Disabled Workers’ and
Carers’ Network for their input too.
The main changes within the new
policy/procedure are as follows:
- The introduction of an informal stage at
which the line manager and the employee would discuss an attendance
support plan.
- OH referrals recommended from day one of
absence for a stress/mental health condition.
- Greater emphasis on our duties as an employer
under the Equality Act in relation to disabled staff. Including
recording absence as disability related where appropriate, managers
considering different attendance concern levels for a
disabled employee and ensuring that any medical treatment required
to manage an impairment is given as paid time off to the
employee.
- A commitment regarding how we will support
staff with a terminal illness in line with the TUC’s
‘Dying to Work’ campaign.
- A formal 2 stage attendance management
process.
- Formal warnings replaced with the setting of
formal review periods, which can be given at both stages of the
procedure.
- The creation of an attendance toolkit to
accompany the policy/procedure to support both managers and
staff
|
Assessment of
overall impacts and any further recommendations[9]
|
For clarity all
disproportionate impacts on specific groups are highlighted in the
single section below.
Sickness data by
equality strand is shown in the table below – 175 employees
(exc schools)
Protected group
|
% of sickness cases involving people sharing
protected characteristic 2017/18
|
% of people sharing protected characteristic in
workforce as at 31.3.18
|
BME
|
3.45%
|
6.9%
|
White
Other
|
8.28%
|
6.85%
|
White
Irish
|
1.38%
|
2.26%
|
White
British
|
86.89%
|
83.99%
|
Disabled
|
16.79%
|
7.51%
|
LGB
|
13.22%
|
11.82%
|
Male
|
49.14%
|
40.30%
|
Female
|
50.86%
|
59.70%
|
<20
|
0%
|
0.13%
|
20-24
|
1.71%
|
1.78%
|
25-29
|
2.29%
|
5.12%
|
30-34
|
7.43%
|
7.96%
|
35-39
|
9.71%
|
12.3%
|
40-44
|
16.57%
|
13.18%
|
45-49
|
16.0%
|
16.43%
|
50-54
|
14.86%
|
17.52%
|
55-59
|
9.14%
|
14.05%
|
60-64
|
15.43%
|
8.22%
|
65+
|
6.86%
|
3.14%
|
No
religion
|
57.03%
|
56.22%
|
Christian
|
32.23%
|
34.51%
|
Other
religion
|
10.74%
|
9.27%
|
Overall impacts and
notes:
- Where a greater
proportion of that staff group are subject to some form of
action/intervention under our current procedure I have highlighted
the relevant rows in the table above.
- From the above
table, it is clear that in terms of sickness cases a larger
proportion of disabled staff are subject to action of some form
under our current procedure. The new policy/procedure seeks to
address this and the changes proposed in related to disability
related absences are detailed below. From union/forum feedback this
appeared to be the main area of focus in terms of the review. The
higher incidence of formal action/intervention in relation to those
aged over 60 is also likely to correlate with a higher incidence of
illness and possibly long-term conditions among this group.
- In terms of some
of the other groups highlighted above e.g. staff aged 60+, LGB
staff, male staff and ‘white other’ staff in particular
further analysis will need to be undertaken to identify whether
these cases relate to a particular directorate/service area or due
to a particular absence reason.
- However, the
greater proportion of male staff being subject to
action/intervention under the current procedure could be related to
particular departments e.g. CityClean where the main reason for
absence is musculo-skeletal absence and they have the highest level
of absence within the EEC Directorate. The new policy/procedure
will better support those staff with the introduction of the
attendance support plan, which encourages earlier informal
discussions and the recording of adjustments/support offered to the
employee.
|
Potential issues
|
Mitigating actions
|
- Staff and
managers being aware of the new policy and procedure scheduled to
come into effect in the summer of 2019 as part of our well-being
agenda.
- Staff being
concerned about how the new procedure will work if they are already
being taken through the existing attendance management
procedure.
- Managers not
understanding what needs to go into the new attendance support plan
to support the employee.
- Managers being
aware of the need to consider adjusting attendance concern levels
for a disabled employee (including mental health conditions) and
the need to record everything put in place to support the employee
on an attendance support plan. In addition, managers being aware of
a new category on FirstCare of ‘disability related
absence’ so that this can be recorded as such.
- Ensuring that
staff who have a terminal illness are aware of the changes to the
new policy/procedure, to support them to remain in work as
long as they are able to.
- Staff not
understanding why an OH referral is recommended from day 1 of
absence as a result of stress or a mental health condition.
|
- Once agreed there
will be a series of regular communications to staff and managers
regarding the new policy and procedure together with training for
managers, the new toolkit on the wave.
- There will be
communications on what will happen if an employee is already being
dealt with under the current procedure and how they would move into
the new procedure.
- From February
2019, training will be scheduled for managers on attendance
management and the changes proposed so that managers are ready for
the introduction of the new policy/procedure.
- The training
provided to managers will cover all the changes being made and the
fact that these changes have been made to provide better support to
disabled staff.
- Again through
communications to staff/managers making sure that staff are aware
of the TUC’s ‘Dying to Work’ campaign and the
principles within this, which the council is planning to sign up to
(subject to agreement by PR&G).
- Communicate why
this is important. From feedback received, too often OH referrals
are not made as soon as possible and are left too late. By
recommending these from day 1 we know that the earlier support is
given to the employee the earlier the employee will feel able to
return plus they will feel supported by the organisation.
|
Actions
planned[10]
|
- Further
engagement with the workers forums, staff, managers and the unions
to ensure all are fully informed about the new Attendance Policy
and Procedure and that all have been given the opportunity to ask
questions about the proposed changes.
- Communications to
managers and staff on the changes within the new policy and
procedure and the benefits of this as part of our well-being
workstream within Our People Promise.
- Training on
attendance management being refreshed for managers on the new
policy and procedure and a number of sessions scheduled from
November 2019 onwards.
- Guidance for
managers and staff on the new policy and procedure, together with
other helpful information will be available to all in the new
Attendance Toolkit, which will be available on the Wave.
- Discussions will
need to take place at all DMT’s regarding the proposed
changes and discussions will also take place at all Directorate
Equalities Group Meetings to make sure any potential issues have
been addressed prior to implementation of the new policy and
procedure in early 2020.
- The policy and
procedure to manage attendance will be reviewed and evaluated at
regular intervals once implemented.
|
EIA sign-off: (for the EIA to be
final an email must sent from the relevant people agreeing it or
this section must be signed)
Person completing the
EIA: Laura
Keogh
Date: 23rd September 2019
BHCC Equality
lead:
Sarah
Tighe-Ford
Date: 23rd September 2019
Guidance
end-notes
[1] The
following principles, drawn from case law, explain what we must do
to fulfil our duties under the Equality Act:
·
Knowledge: everyone working for the council must be aware of our
equality duties and apply them appropriately in their
work.
·
Timeliness: the duty applies at the time of considering policy
options and/or before a final decision is taken – not
afterwards.
·
Real Consideration:
the duty must be an integral and rigorous
part of your decision-making and influence the
process.
·
Sufficient Information:
you must assess what information you have
and what is needed to give proper consideration.
·
No delegation: the council is responsible for ensuring that any
contracted services which provide services on our behalf can comply
with the duty, are required in contracts to comply with it, and do
comply in practice. It is a duty that cannot be
delegated.
·
Review: the equality duty is a continuing duty. It applies
when a policy is developed/agreed, and when it is
implemented/reviewed.
·
Proper Record Keeping:
to show that we have fulfilled our duties
we must keep records of the process and the impacts
identified.
NB: Filling out this EIA in itself does not meet the
requirements of the equality
duty. All the requirements above
must be fulfilled or the EIA (and any decision based on it) may be
open to challenge. Properly used, an EIA can be a
tool to help us comply with our equality duty and as a
record that to demonstrate that we have done so.
[2]Our
duties in the Equality Act 2010
As
a public sector organisation, we have a legal duty (under the
Equality Act 2010) to show that we have identified and considered
the impact and potential impact of our activities on all people
with ‘protected characteristics’ (age, disability,
gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or
belief, sex, sexual orientation, and marriage and civil
partnership.
This applies to policies, services
(including commissioned services), and our employees. The level of
detail of this consideration will depend on what you are assessing,
who it might affect, those groups’ vulnerability, and how
serious any potential impacts might be. We use this EIA template to
complete this process and evidence our consideration.
The
following are the duties in the Act. You must give ‘due
regard’ (pay conscious attention) to the need to:
- avoid, reduce or minimise negative
impact (if you identify unlawful discrimination, including
victimisation and harassment, you must stop the action and take
advice immediately).
- promote equality of opportunity. This
means the need to:
-
Remove or minimise disadvantages suffered by equality groups
-
Take steps to meet the needs of equality groups
-
Encourage equality groups to participate in public life or any
other activity where participation is disproportionately low
-
Consider if there is a need to treat disabled people differently,
including more favourable treatment where necessary
- foster good relations between
people who share a protected characteristic and those who do
not. This means:
-
Tackle prejudice
-
Promote understanding
[3] EIAs are always proportionate to:
- The size of the
service or scope of the policy/strategy
- The resources
involved
- The numbers of
people affected
- The size of the
likely impact
- The vulnerability
of the people affected
The greater the
potential adverse impact of the proposed policy on a protected
group (e.g. disabled people), the more vulnerable the group in the
context being considered, the more thorough and demanding the
process required by the Act will be.
[4] When to complete an EIA:
- When planning or
developing a new service, policy or strategy
- When reviewing an
existing service, policy or strategy
- When ending or
substantially changing a service, policy or strategy
- When there is an
important change in the service, policy or strategy, or in the city
(eg: a change in population), or at a national level (eg: a change
of legislation)
Assessment of
equality impact can be evidenced as part of the process of
reviewing or needs assessment or strategy development or
consultation or planning. It does not have to be on this template,
but must be documented. Wherever possible, build the EIA into your
usual planning/review processes.
Do you need to complete an EIA?
Consider:
- Is the policy,
decision or service likely to be relevant to any people because of
their protected characteristics?
- How many
people is it likely to affect?
- How
significant are its impacts?
- Does it relate
to an area where there are known inequalities?
- How vulnerable
are the people (potentially) affected?
If there are potential impacts on
people but you decide not to complete an EIA it is usually
sensible to document why.
[5]
Title of EIA: This should clearly explain what service / policy /
strategy / change you are assessing
[6]
ID no: The unique reference
for this EIA. If in doubt contact your CCG or BHCC equality lead
(see page 1)
[7]
Team/Department: Main team responsible for the
policy, practice, service or
function being assessed
[8]
Focus of EIA: A member of the public should have a good
understanding of the policy or service and any proposals after
reading this section. Please use plain English and write any
acronyms in full first time - eg: ‘Equality Impact Assessment
(EIA)’
This section should explain what you are
assessing:
- What are the main
aims or purpose of the policy, practice, service or function?
- Who implements,
carries out or delivers the policy, practice, service or function?
Please state where this is more than one person/team/body and where
other organisations deliver under procurement or partnership
arrangements.
- How does it fit with other services?
- Who is affected by the policy, practice,
service or function, or by how it is delivered? Who are the
external and internal service-users, groups, or communities?
- What outcomes do you want to achieve, why and
for whom? Eg: what do you want to provide, what changes or
improvements, and what should the benefits be?
- What do existing or previous inspections of
the policy, practice, service or function tell you?
- What is the reason for the proposal or
change (financial, service, legal etc)? The Act requires us to make
these clear.
[9] Assessment of overall impacts and
any further recommendations
- Make a
frank and realistic assessment of the overall extent to which the
negative impacts can be reduced or avoided by the mitigating
measures. Explain what positive impacts will result from the
actions and how you can make the most of these.
- Countervailing
considerations: These may include the reasons behind the
formulation of the policy, the benefits it is expected to deliver,
budget reductions, the need to avert a graver crisis by introducing
a policy now and not later, and so on. The weight of these factors
in favour of implementing the policy must then be measured
against the weight of any evidence as to the potential
negative equality impacts of the policy,
- Are there any
further recommendations? Is further engagement needed? Is more
research or monitoring needed? Does there need to be a change in
the proposal itself?
[10]
Action Planning: The Equality
Duty is an ongoing duty: policies must be kept under review,
continuing to give ‘due regard’ to the duty.
If an assessment of a
broad proposal leads to more specific proposals, then further
equality assessment and consultation are needed.